Connect with us

Featured

Anambra State Government and NFF bribe Club Owners with #500,000 to stage scripted protest against Dr Ifeanyi Ubah and Minister for Sports

Published

on

Joel Ajayi

In continuance with the ongoing corrupt entanglement between the Anambra State Government and the NFF, the sum of #500,000.00 has been promised to any Club Owner, who pens his signature in a protest letter addressed to the Senate Committee on Sports headed by Obinna Ogba, against the Honourable Minister for Sports, Hon Sunday Dare and the Chairman of ANSFA, Sen Dr Ifeanyi Ubah

This desperate ploy was hatched by the NFF and funded by the State Government, in reaction to the candid verdict of the Sports Minister, on the ongoing charade and distraction in Anambra State Football

The NFF agreed to go to bed with the State Government on the condition that the Awka Mini-stadium as well as some other contracts in the State, will be awarded exclusively to the NFF using Monimichelle as a proxy, with an earmarked sum of #1.2 billion nairas as a mobilizer to continue sponsoring illegality against Sen Dr Ifeanyi Ubah, in hopes that he might get distracted from pursuing his Gubernatorial ambition in 2021

The funny this is, only the Anambra State Football Congress has the right to invite any third party into the FA and as such, this latest charade is dead on arrival and elicit the following questions:

1. The Club Owners are part of the Anambra State Football Congress which means they were part and parcel of the elections before, during and after. So at what stage did these few Club Owners realise that all is not well?

2. The Appeals and Electoral Committees till date, never got any complaint against the process including from the Club Owners who have agreed to this devil’s snare. Why?

3. Can these Club Owners provide irrefutable proof to support their grievance in line with breaches in the Electoral process which must include but not limited to deliberate disenfranchisement for the post of Chairmanship of the FA?

4. Why is it that no other position is under controversy except the Chairmanship even when nobody bought the forms except Sen Dr Ifeanyi Ubah?

5. If the election process is flawed, then why is nobody contesting the results of the Board (7 members) and LFC positions (21 members)?

6. Why is the NFF hellbent on sacrificing the integrity of football in Anambra State by becoming an active political tool for #1.2 billion naira contracts in exchange?

7. How come all of a sudden, The Governor has decided to invest #1.2 billion in contracts, awarded to the NFF, when he has never had any Special Adviser, no Special Assistant and no Commissioner for Sports, never sponsored or facilitated any Sports for the State (the Police Games in a National Event so it doesn’t count and even then, 80% of the event took place in other South Eastern States so it was the South East that hosted the event, not Anambra State owing to lack of infrastructure) since he assumed power 6 years ago till date?

8. Before this present Government, we had Anambra Sports Festival, School Inter House Sports, Inter School Games, Trader’s Cup and Governor’s Cup. All of these have been murdered by this administration so why the sudden fixation on ANSFA alone, instead of resurrecting the grassroots Sports activities if truly they care about Sports in Anambra State?

Surely by now, Ndi Anambra have seen that this is a deliberate witch-hunt against Sen Dr Ifeanyi Ubah by unscrupulous and shameless elements with zero passion for the growth and integrity of the game

Until the NFF can intelligently counter the 169-page dossier of Sen Dr Ifeanyi Ubah, they will simply be beating around the bush whilst milking Anambra State dry by preying on the naivety and desperation of The Governor

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Featured

From U.S. Alarm to Tinubu’s Validation

Published

on

U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent decision to list Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” triggered a wave of reactions across diplomatic and political circles.

While many Nigerians viewed the designation as a national embarrassment and critics seized it as evidence of deepening instability, the development has taken on a surprising twist: it has become an unintended validation of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s ongoing reforms.

For global observers, Trump’s warning underscored the security and governance challenges facing Africa’s largest democracy. But within Nigeria, it cast renewed attention on Tinubu’s attempts to tackle the very issues that led to the U.S. designation from terror attacks and mass kidnappings to deep rooted economic distortions.

Political analysts note that long before Trump’s statement, Tinubu had already begun overhauling Nigeria’s security and economic systems, taking steps more far-reaching than those implemented by his predecessors. Trump may have amplified global concern, but Tinubu had already moved into the repair phase.

Upon assuming office, Tinubu inherited a nation strained by years of structural decline a costly fuel subsidy regime, an opaque multi-tiered foreign exchange system, rising insecurity, and widening regional imbalances. Instead of opting for gradualism, he pursued sweeping measures aimed at resetting Nigeria’s foundations.

One of his earliest actions was an overhaul of the security architecture. Tinubu dismissed and replaced the previous service chiefs, appointed field tested commanders, strengthened joint operations, and demanded measurable results. The armed forces intensified land and air offensives, resulting in major arrests, rescue operations, and the neutralisation of terror cells. Security improvements were coupled with community-level interventions to break cycles of violence and restore economic activity in long neglected regions.

Economically, Tinubu took two of the most contentious decisions in decades: removal of petrol subsidy and unification of the exchange rate. His administration framed the decisions as necessary to end fiscal leakages and curb entrenched rent-seeking. Though the reforms generated short-term hardships, they also freed revenue for federal and state governments and signaled to investors that Nigeria was ready for structural cleanup.

In governance, Tinubu implemented what analysts describe as an equity-driven restructuring of the federation. Every geopolitical zone now has a dedicated regional development commission a move designed to institutionalise fairness and ensure balanced growth. This expansion is widely regarded as one of the administration’s most strategic long-term decisions.

Meanwhile, Nigeria is witnessing what officials describe as a new wave of infrastructure expansion. Work is underway on the multi-state Lagos–Calabar Coastal Highway, the Sokoto–Badagry Super Highway, major rail upgrades, power sector reforms, and the rehabilitation of key federal roads. Port modernization projects are also accelerating to position Nigeria as a competitive maritime hub.

International confidence appears to be responding to these reforms. Tinubu has pursued aggressive economic diplomacy, securing investment commitments from the UAE, Germany, Saudi Arabia, the United States, and leading multinationals. Government officials report that more than $30 billion in investment pledges were recorded during the administration’s first year.

The government has also launched a comprehensive tax reform effort aimed at curbing multiple taxation, expanding the tax net, and strengthening transparency a shift intended to help raise Nigeria’s historically low tax-to-GDP ratio.

As global reactions to Trump’s warning continue, Nigerian officials argue that the designation inadvertently highlights a turning point rather than a downward spiral. While the U.S. warning spotlighted Nigeria’s challenges, Tinubu’s defenders say the administration is already confronting those challenges with bold, long-term reforms.

In this framing, Trump’s alarm has become a backdrop that underscores the urgency of Tinubu’s agenda and, paradoxically, the evidence of its relevance.

Supporters of the president say the label “country of concern” is being transformed into a story of a country in recovery, driven by a leader intent on reversing years of stagnation. According to them, Tinubu’s approach prioritising difficult reforms over popular short-term fixes is precisely what positions Nigeria for renewed global confidence.

In a twist of geopolitical irony, what was meant to warn the world about Nigeria may now be drawing attention to an unfolding attempt at national renewal.

Continue Reading

Trending

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)