News
Land Fraud Showdown: Maxwell Okpara & the Yesufu Clan Slam EFCC as Public Sympathy Shifts Toward Dr Mrs Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac
Joel Ajayi
ABUJA, July 21, 2025 A seismic shift is unfolding in Nigeria’s land fraud saga: civil society agitator Maxwell Chibuike Okpara, 79-year-old Colleen Mero Yesufu, and the Yesufu family have launched a smear crusade that is unraveling under the weight of facts. Once presented as defenders of justice, they are now under fire for manipulating public institutions, deploying emotion in place of evidence, and undermining the legal process for personal gain.
Legal experts and concerned Nigerians are questioning whether Okpara was hired by the Yesufu family specifically to conduct unethical public campaigns on their behalf.
Despite holding no legal brief in either the criminal or civil proceedings, Okpara has positioned himself as a spokesperson for the family.
He has given press conferences calling for enforcement of a forfeiture order — a forfeiture that had already been dismissed by the courts and withdrawn by the EFCC.
For a lawyer of his standing to either be unaware of this or to knowingly mislead the public raises serious professional concerns.
Observers now ask: What is Maxwell Okpara’s real interest in this matter? He is not a lawyer on record. He has no place in either proceeding. Yet he has aggressively inserted himself into an ongoing legal dispute — disregarding due process, court rulings, and ethical boundaries. Many in the legal community are stunned that the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has not sanctioned him. His repeated public outbursts, defamatory remarks about law enforcement, and misuse of civil society platforms suggest a pattern of conduct that risks embarrassing the entire legal profession.
Some have gone further, calling him a legal tout and political scoundrel — hired to “undo” a case that is already before the courts. If Okpara truly believes in the rule of law, then he should submit to it, not defy it in public squares.
His conduct begs the question: Why has he not been arrested by the Nigerian police for openly defaming the Inspector General and fabricating claims? Civil society groups are free to advocate for transparency, but they must present facts — not fiction — and not act as mercenaries for private interests.
Civic Group Demands Justice — Or Else
At a thunderous press briefing Thursday, Okpara—frontman for INAHURAT—accused the EFCC and Nigerian police of deliberately stalling enforcement of a Federal High Court interim forfeiture order for Guzape Plot 4022 and Katampe Plots 1861–63, originally tied to 79-year-old widow Colleen Mero Yesufu. These allegations are contained in a Daily Post exposé that has rocked institutional trust.
(TheNigeriaLawyer, Daily Post Nigeria)
Meanwhile, civil liberty watchdogs observe that Maxwell Okpara and the Yesufu clan could be using political muscle, not evidence, to pressure enforcement agencies. Their relentless accusations—launched precisely when the courts have become inconvenient—raise more questions than answers.
The Tide Turns in Public Opinion
Nigeria’s silent majority is now tuning in to the argument of power over principle.
As observers quietly ask: If Okpara and the Yesufu family were so confident in their claims, why are they now crying foul when the EFCC stalls enforcement?—onlookers see a pattern suggesting they want results, fast, regardless of facts.
Meanwhile, Dr Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac and her husband Isaac Yusuf stand firmly on documented transactions: verified payments, registered titles, and full cooperation with the ICPC, FCTA, EFCC, and police. Yet, their company Homadil Realty was hit hardest—projects frozen, reputations tarnished, and media trials launched on allegations now under scrutiny.
(Premium Times Nigeria)
Civil‐Liberty Groups Challenge EFCC Motives
Independent rights monitors are now questioning whether the EFCC bowed to public pressure or was manoeuvred by political narratives. CHRICED, another respected watchdog, has publicly expressed alarm over “police complicity” in shielding suspect parties and the EFCC’s refusal to act on court-ordered forfeiture — a forfeiture which, notably, has already been dismissed by the court and withdrawn by the EFCC, raising even more questions about the accuracy of their ongoing advocacy.
(CHRICED)
In a headline moment, one prominent civic leader told reporters, “The true victim in this case may be the rule of law itself.” Critics argue that the EFCC faces a critical test: enforce the law impartially, or risk becoming a vessel for manipulation.
From Victim to Victor
For Ambassador Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac, her husband Engineer Isaac Ishaku Yusuf, and Homadil Realty Limited, this delay in the EFCC’s case isn’t just procedural — it’s vindication. Having pledged full transparency, submitted to questioning, and honoured every court order, they’ve stood as pillars of honesty. The moment Maxwell Okpara’s INAHURAT and the Yesufu family began demanding action, the minute justice seemed inconvenient, public trust cracked.
What’s Next?
The spotlight now turns to the judiciary and anti-graft bodies. The public must now ask: Why is the EFCC being pressured to enforce a forfeiture order that has already been dismissed by the court and withdrawn by the Commission itself? Will the police, who have been accused of complicity, be swayed by political pressure rather than guided by the facts and legal rulings? And will Maxwell Okpara, Colleen Mero, and kin answer hard questions about the timing and basis of their campaign?
One thing is clear: public sympathy is turning sharply toward Ambassador Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac, her husband Engineer Isaac Ishaku Yusuf,Homadil Realty Limited, seen now as the wrongfully accused who followed the law.
Bottom Line
• Maxwell Okpara and the Yesufu family appear to be weaponizing emotion and influence, not judicial proof.
• Their camp’s sudden pivot from aggressive accusations to calling out the EFCC signals alarm—not integrity.
• Meanwhile, Ambassador Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac, her husband Engineer Isaac Ishaku Yusuf, and their company Homadil Realty Limited, once under siege, are now poised to emerge vindicated, their case strengthened by patience and process.
The real question now: Will Nigeria’s legal guardians uphold the law or be swayed by political drama?
Health
New Malaria Plan Puts States, Local Data At Centre Of Nigeria’s 2030 Response
Cyril Ogar
Nigeria’s latest malaria data point to a country making progress overall but facing sharply different disease burdens from one state to another, prompting health authorities to shift emphasis towards locally tailored interventions under a new five-year strategy.
The National Malaria Strategic Plan (NMSP) 2026–2030, launched alongside the 2025 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey (NMIS) report, seeks to cut malaria parasite prevalence and deaths by 50 per cent from 2025 levels by 2030.
Rather than applying a uniform national response, the plan prioritises interventions based on local epidemiological evidence, while also calling for stronger domestic financing, improved diagnosis and treatment, better surveillance and clearer accountability.
The Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Prof. Muhammad Ali Pate, represented by the ministry’s Permanent Secretary, Mrs Daju Kachallom, presented the government’s position at the joint launch in Abuja.
Pate described the survey and strategic plan as essential tools for identifying weaknesses in malaria control and directing resources towards areas with the greatest need.
He said the survey’s findings on prevalence, prevention, diagnosis and treatment would support policy development, programme implementation, resource allocation and performance assessment.
The minister said the strategic plan was designed to accelerate progress towards a malaria-free Nigeria while remaining consistent with national health priorities and the World Health Organisation’s global malaria strategy.
He commended the National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP), the National Population Commission (NPC), development partners and other stakeholders involved in producing the survey and plan.
Pate also called for a shared national effort involving federal and state governments, the private sector, communities and households, stressing that malaria elimination could not be achieved by government alone.
The 2025 NMIS shows that malaria parasite prevalence among children aged six to 59 months, measured through microscopy, fell from 42 per cent in 2010 to 23 per cent in 2018, 22 per cent in 2021 and 15 per cent in 2025.
However, the national improvement masks substantial differences between states. Prevalence among children in the same age group ranged from two per cent in Lagos State to 31 per cent in Ebonyi State.
The figures indicate that progress has not been evenly distributed and that malaria control efforts must be adapted to the conditions in individual states and communities.
Earlier, the National Coordinator of NMEP, Dr Nnenna Ogbulafor, said the NMSP was developed from the 2025 NMIS findings and other programme data.
She said the evidence would help policymakers locate high-burden areas, improve the design of interventions and direct limited resources to communities most in need.
Ogbulafor said the plan was aligned with Nigeria’s health sector priorities and the WHO Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030.
She identified policy alignment, state-level leadership, domestic financing, partnerships and accountability as central to implementation.
The national coordinator urged state governments, civil society organisations and development partners to take ownership of the plan and support coordinated, adequately funded malaria programmes.
She said the differences in prevalence across states made subnational planning indispensable to meeting the national targets.
Ogbulafor called on states to develop comprehensive malaria control programmes reflecting local disease burdens, epidemiological evidence and available resources.
She also stressed the need for sustained domestic financing and partnerships to close funding gaps and maintain implementation through 2030.
NMEP, she said, would work with the National Malaria Working Group and international partners to track implementation, assess performance and review results regularly.
The plan aims to raise access to and use of preventive interventions to at least 80 per cent, achieve at least 90 per cent effective coverage of malaria diagnosis and appropriate treatment among at-risk populations, and improve surveillance performance from a baseline of 47 per cent to 70 per cent by 2030.
It also targets stronger governance and organisational capacity, with at least 60 per cent of malaria programme resources expected to come from domestic sources by 2030.
The survey data show that prevention remains uneven. Only 54 per cent of households had at least one insecticide-treated net, while 45 per cent of children under five and 54 per cent of pregnant women aged 15–49 slept under a net on the night before the survey.
Protection during pregnancy was also incomplete. Among women aged 15–49 who had a live birth in the preceding two years, 62 per cent received at least one dose of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine during their last pregnancy, but only 33 per cent received three or more doses.
The findings point to the need to expand access to insecticide-treated nets and intermittent preventive treatment for pregnant women.
Diagnosis is another major gap. Of children under five who had a fever in the two weeks before the survey, 59 per cent had advice or treatment sought, but only 18 per cent had blood taken for malaria testing.
The strategic plan therefore places emphasis on prompt testing, appropriate treatment, preventive services and public awareness.
In his remarks, the Director-General of NPC, Dr Abubakar Muhammed, pledged the commission’s continued support for credible demographic and health data to guide policymaking and malaria elimination efforts.
Muhammed said the survey reflected the partnership between the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, through NMEP, and the NPC.
He said the collaboration brought together expertise in malaria control, demographic surveys and data management to produce information for national planning and development.
The NPC director-general said the commission would continue to modernise its survey operations through technologies such as the Global Positioning System (GPS) and spatial techniques.
He urged policymakers, programme managers, researchers and development partners to use the findings to refine strategies, improve implementation and target communities where interventions were most needed.
Muhammed commended the ministry, NMEP, technical consultants, state enumerators and field teams for their roles in conducting the survey.
He said the report would provide a strong evidence base for a coordinated national malaria response.
The launch of the NMIS report and NMSP 2026–2030 places the next phase of Nigeria’s malaria response on a clearer understanding of where the disease remains most entrenched, while challenging states and partners to convert that evidence into measurable local action.
-
Featured7 years agoLampard Names New Chelsea Manager
-
Featured7 years agoFG To Extends Lockdown In FCT, Lagos Ogun states For 7days
-
Featured7 years agoChildren Custody: Court Adjourns Mike Ezuruonye, Wife’s Case To April 7
-
Featured7 years agoNYSC Dismisses Report Of DG’s Plan To Islamize Benue Orientation Camp
-
Featured5 years agoTransfer Saga: How Mikel Obi Refused to compensate me After I Linked Him Worth $4m Deal In Kuwait SC – Okafor
-
Featured7 years ago
Board urges FG to establish one-stop rehabilitation centres in 6 geopolitical zones
-
Sports4 years ago
TINUBU LAMBAST DELE MOMODU
-
News2 years agoZulu to Super Eagles B team, President Tinubu is happy with you
