Connect with us

Featured

The Need To Retain Three-Term Tenure for Sports Federation Presidents

Published

on


The debate over tenure limits for Presidents of Sports Federations in Nigeria has resurfaced, with some pushing for a reduction from the current three-term limit—set by the 2021 election guidelines—to just two terms.

While the call for reform may seem progressive on the surface, a deeper look reveals that maintaining the three-term structure is crucial for Nigeria’s long-term aspirations in global sports governance.


Experience and Influence Take Time
Leadership in international sports is not built overnight. Nigerian sports administrators require time to develop credibility, cultivate relationships, and gain the necessary influence to secure leadership positions at continental and global levels.

Two terms—typically spanning just eight years—are often insufficient for a federation president to make a significant mark beyond national borders. By the time they establish their presence and recognition within the African and international sports community, their tenure is nearly over, severely limiting their chances of ascending to influential global roles.


It is telling that only one Nigerian currently holds a continental sports presidency. While he is not a sitting federation president, his case is an exception rather than the norm. Strong-performing presidents, given adequate time, stand a far better chance of rising through the ranks and representing Nigeria on the global stage.


A Dubious Push for Change
Ironically, some of the loudest voices advocating for a two-term limit are individuals who previously held federation leadership positions for over 20 years. Their sudden shift in stance raises questions about the sincerity of their motives. If long tenures were beneficial during their time in office, why is it now a problem for others? This contradiction exposes a lack of moral justification for the push to shorten tenure limits.


Rather than restricting tenure, the focus should be on strengthening Nigeria’s sports electoral system. A well-structured process would ensure that non-performing presidents can be voted out, even after a single term, while high-achieving leaders are allowed to continue their impactful work.

Arbitrary tenure restrictions only serve to stifle progress and disrupt the continuity needed for meaningful international advancement.
The Risk of Weakening Nigeria’s Global Influence
Reducing the tenure limit would not only disrupt federation stability but also weaken Nigeria’s influence in world sports.

Many high-performing presidents would be cut off just as they begin to build strong international networks and gain recognition for leadership roles. This approach plays into the hands of competing nations that allow their sports administrators to rise through the ranks over extended periods, accumulating power and decision-making leverage on the world stage.


If Nigeria is serious about increasing its presence in global sports governance, we must empower our best leaders with the time and platform to compete effectively. A premature exit due to tenure restrictions only benefits our rivals while diminishing Nigeria’s standing in international sports politics.


The Way Forward: A Balanced Approach
While tenure limits should not be indefinite, a well-structured system must balance continuity with accountability. Federations with approved constitutions outlining tenure limits—whether two or three terms—should adhere strictly to their constitutional provisions. However, for federations without approved constitutions, the Ministry of Sports’ existing guideline of a three-term maximum should be upheld.


This approach ensures fairness while safeguarding Nigeria’s broader interests in global sports. Instead of imposing restrictive policies that undermine our potential, we should focus on building a transparent and effective electoral system that rewards performance, promotes stability, and secures Nigeria’s place in the corridors of international sports leadership.


Retaining the three-term tenure limit is not just about individual officeholders—it is about Nigeria’s future in global sports governance.

Continue Reading

Business

Turning Africa’s Raw Materials Into Wealth: The ARMS 2026 Industrial Agenda

Published

on

By Joel Ajayi

For decades, Africa’s vast natural resources have powered industries and economies far beyond the continent, while many African countries have remained largely exporters of unprocessed commodities and importers of finished products.

That familiar pattern is now coming under renewed scrutiny as policymakers, researchers, investors and industrialists seek to change the direction of Africa’s resource economy.

At the centre of that conversation is the second edition of the Africa Raw Materials Summit (ARMS 2026), scheduled for October 19 and 20 at the Abuja Continental Hotel, Abuja, under the theme: “From African Feedstock to African Factories.”

Organised by the Raw Materials Research and Development Council (RMRDC), the summit is being positioned as more than another gathering of policymakers and industry stakeholders. It is intended to provide a platform for confronting the structural challenges that have kept African raw materials largely disconnected from local manufacturing.

Africa has for years operated largely within a “pit-to-port” economic model, exporting raw materials while importing expensive finished products.

Speaking at a press conference ahead of the summit on Tuesday in Abuja, the Director-General and Chief Executive Officer of RMRDC, Prof. Nnanyelugo Martin Ike-Muonso, said the event would bring together policymakers, investors, researchers, technology providers and industrialists to develop practical strategies for transforming Africa’s abundant natural resources into industrial wealth.

The challenge, therefore, is not simply the abundance of resources, but the continent’s ability to transform those resources into industrial value, employment, technology and wealth within Africa.

Nigeria alone, according to the RMRDC, has more than $582.4 billion in documented non-renewable natural resources, while the wider continent possesses substantial deposits of critical minerals, agricultural raw materials and industrial feedstock.

Yet, the benefits of this resource endowment have often been constrained by inadequate processing capacity, weak infrastructure, limited technology, financing gaps and fragmented regional value chains.

From Dialogue to Industrial Action

ARMS 2026 builds on the maiden edition held in May 2025, which attracted more than 1,000 delegates from across the world.

The inaugural summit also witnessed the unveiling of the Ten-Year Raw Materials Transformation Roadmap (2025–2034) by the Minister of State for Industry, Senator John Owen Enoh.

The roadmap was designed around areas including technological capability, climate-resilient processing and backward integration, establishing a policy framework for greater domestic utilisation of Africa’s raw materials.

The second edition is expected to move the conversation further by bringing policy, capital, technology and industrial stakeholders around practical mechanisms for turning raw materials into locally manufactured products.

One of the major proposals highlighted by the RMRDC is the 30 per cent Mandatory Value Addition Bill, which seeks to establish a statutory minimum level of value addition to Nigerian raw materials before export.

The Council says the proposed framework could support job creation, import substitution, foreign-exchange conservation and increased manufacturing contribution to the economy.

Building the Infrastructure for Value Addition

The industrial transformation envisaged by ARMS 2026 goes beyond legislation.

A major concern is the “missing middle” between where raw materials are produced and where factories are located.

Poor transportation networks, inadequate cold-chain facilities, weak rural roads, limited testing and certification infrastructure and border-related delays can make locally sourced materials more expensive and less competitive.

Consequently, logistics and infrastructure constitute one of the five principal pillars of the summit.

The objective is to develop more reliable corridors connecting farms and mines with processing centres and manufacturing facilities, thereby reducing losses and improving the movement of industrial inputs.

The Digital Dimension

Technology is also becoming an important part of the Council’s strategy.

The RMRDC says it has developed the Nigeria Integrated Information Statistical System for Raw Materials and Products (NISSRAMP), described as a digital repository containing information on feedstock deposits, specifications, production outputs and industrial absorption rates.

The Council has also highlighted its transition towards paperless operations and its certification as a Data Controller/Processor of Major Importance by the Nigeria Data Protection Commission.

Such digital infrastructure could provide investors and manufacturers with better information about the availability and characteristics of raw materials while supporting more informed industrial planning.

Turning Waste Into Industrial Inputs

Another major component of ARMS 2026 is the proposed expansion of the circular economy.

The summit will examine how agricultural by-products, mine tailings, scrap metals and biomass can be recovered and reused as inputs for new production processes rather than being treated simply as waste.

The RMRDC argues that such an approach could lower raw-material costs while supporting more sustainable and climate-resilient manufacturing systems.

For Africa, where industrial expansion must increasingly balance economic development with environmental considerations, waste industrialisation could become an important part of the continent’s manufacturing conversation.

From National Production to African Value Chains

The African Continental Free Trade Area is another important element of the summit’s agenda.

The RMRDC sees AfCFTA as an opportunity to create regional value chains in which raw materials sourced in one African country can be processed and supplied to manufacturers in another.

Under such a model, Africa would move beyond simply exporting commodities to external markets and develop stronger internal networks for supplying chemicals, refined minerals, agricultural inputs and other industrial materials across national borders.

This approach places regional integration at the heart of Africa’s industrialisation strategy.

Bridging Research and Capital

A recurring weakness in many developing economies is the gap between research and commercialisation.

Innovations may emerge from universities, research institutions and laboratories without receiving the financing, equipment or market connections required to become commercially viable.

ARMS 2026 intends to address that gap through technology commercialisation and capital linkages, connecting research outputs with investors, development finance institutions and industrial off-takers.

The RMRDC has also cited partnerships with the Bank of Industry for commercial-scale post-harvest processing and a South-South technology-transfer partnership with the National Innovation Centre par Excellence in Shanghai, China.

A Larger Industrial Conversation

The scale of ARMS 2026 is expected to be significantly larger than the maiden edition.

The organisers project more than 1,800 delegates from all 54 African countries and global industrial partners.

The programme will feature high-level policy dialogues, technical panels, an advanced raw materials and technology exhibition, industrial site visits and the African Raw Materials Industry Awards.

The exhibition, in particular, is expected to showcase locally fabricated processing machinery, advanced domestic materials, green chemicals and engineered commercial inputs.

Beyond the speeches and exhibitions, however, the real significance of ARMS 2026 will ultimately depend on what happens after the summit.

Africa’s challenge has never been a shortage of raw materials. The more difficult question has been how to transform those resources into factories, products, skilled employment, technology and sustainable economic opportunities.

For Nigeria and the rest of the continent, the proposed shift from “pit-to-port” to “feedstock-to-factory” therefore represents a broader debate about the future structure of African economies.

ARMS 2026 seeks to place that debate firmly on the industrial agenda — with value addition, technology, finance, infrastructure, circular production and regional trade at the centre.

If the commitments and partnerships generated by the summit translate into measurable industrial activity, the event could provide another platform for Africa to examine how its enormous resource base can support stronger domestic manufacturing.

The message from the organisers is clear: the continent’s raw materials should not only leave African soil as commodities; they should increasingly become the foundation for African industrial production

Continue Reading

Trending

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)