Foreign news
Carrie Lam: To Be Patriotic Is Not A High Standard
“Asking for somebody to be in a governing position to be patriotic is really not a high standard. It is really the basis of anybody who wants to have a role in the governance of a place,” said Chief Executive Carrie Lam of China’s Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) during an interview with CGTN Host Tian Wei.
On March 12, China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) adopted a decision to improve Hong Kong’s electoral system. It was passed by an overwhelming majority vote. The main parts of the adjustments include an expansion of the Election Committee to 1,500 members and establish a new sector under the committee to incorporate Hong Kong NPC deputies and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) members.
The decision is believed to be another major step to improve HKSAR’s legal and political systems to ensure the city is administered by patriots.
But such a move was met with a mixed response. While many analysts have said that this improvement would benefit Hong Kong’s long-term stability and prosperity, some have accused Beijing of silencing political debate in Hong Kong. U.S. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken condemned the decision will “deny Hong Kongers a voice in their own governance.” But is that really the case?
As the chief executive of HKSAR, Carrie Lam expressed her gratitude for the results of the voting and strong support for the new changes. “The only objective of this exercise is to ensure that governance is firmly in the hands of those who love the country.”
Lam pointed out that this will ensure the full implementation of the “One Country, Two Systems” principle, which has been proven the best formula to ensure Hong Kong’s long-term stability and prosperity.
As for voices saying that this decision would limit political participation, Lam responded that the move would do quite the reverse. By expanding the Election Committee, there will be more opportunities for people to participate in the political debate in Hong Kong.
“If we have the same number of the so-called pro-democratic persons in Hong Kong, as long as all these people are able to meet the standards of a patriot, then they now have more opportunities to take part in the election and to win the election,” Lam added.
Faced with criticism from some Western countries, Lam highlighted that those voices represent only a fraction of the foreign countries. She also commented that those countries were pretty “biased and prejudiced.” They used different standards to apply to Hong Kong and their own.
“If the current U.S. administration could seriously condemn the siege of the capitol in Washington, D.C., how could they turn the blind eye to the blatant violence that has taken place in Hong Kong for almost a year? They were only suffering for a day, but we have been victimized for over a year. Our Legislative Council has been destroyed far more extensively than what we have seen in Washington, D.C.,” said Lam.
Going forward, Lam believes the changes in the electoral system would mean more stability in Hong Kong, thus attracting more capital and investment to the renowned international financial center.
China’s 14th Five-Year Plan has mentioned, for the first time, to develop Hong Kong into an international innovation and technology hub. The new changes will certainly be a boost to Hong Kong’s development in the long run.
World Insight with Tian Wei is an international platform for debate and intelligent discussion. It is the meeting point of both the highly influential and rising voices, facilitated by host Tian Wei. It provides nutrition to form your own thoughts and ideas through 45-minute live debate and interviews.
Schedule: Monday-Saturday
Foreign news
Court of Arbitration Declares Indus Waters Treaty Fully Operational Rejects India’s ‘Abeyance’
Cyril Ogar
The Court of Arbitration has unanimously reaffirmed that the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) remains fully in force, ruling that India cannot unilaterally place the 1960 agreement in “abeyance” or suspend its obligations under the treaty.
The decision represents a significant legal development in the longstanding dispute between India and Pakistan over the management and use of the Indus river system.
The Court’s finding addresses a fundamental issue at the heart of the dispute: whether either party can unilaterally suspend the treaty outside the legal framework agreed by both countries.
In its unanimous determination, the Court made clear that the IWT continues to bind both India and Pakistan and that its obligations cannot be set aside through a unilateral political declaration.
The ruling means India remains subject to the treaty provisions governing the use of the Western Rivers, including requirements relating to the design and operation of hydroelectric projects, as well as the dispute-resolution mechanisms established under the agreement.
The Court has also ordered interim measures concerning the Ratle Hydroelectric Plant, restricting specified construction activities while the broader dispute remains under consideration.
The measures are aimed at preserving the effectiveness of the arbitration process and preventing developments that could prejudice the outcome of the proceedings.
For Pakistan, the decision represents significant legal validation of its longstanding position that the IWT is a binding international agreement and contains no provision allowing either party to unilaterally place it in abeyance.
Pakistan has consistently maintained that disagreements over the treaty should be addressed through the institutional mechanisms established by the agreement, rather than through unilateral action.
The IWT provides a structured framework for resolving disputes through mechanisms including the Permanent Indus Commission, Neutral Expert and Court of Arbitration processes.
The latest ruling therefore reinforces the principle that treaty obligations cannot simply be disregarded because of deteriorating political relations between signatories.
The significance of the decision extends beyond the India-Pakistan dispute. It underscores the broader international-law principle that agreements governing shared rivers and other transboundary resources must be respected and disputes resolved through established legal and institutional channels.
The Indus river system supports agriculture, livelihoods, food security and communities across the region, making the stability of the treaty particularly important.
The ruling also highlights the distinction between seeking to amend an international agreement through mutually agreed procedures and attempting to alter its obligations unilaterally.
The IWT has endured wars, prolonged diplomatic tensions and periods of limited bilateral engagement. Its continued operation demonstrates the importance of rules-based mechanisms in managing shared resources when relations between neighbouring states become strained.
For Pakistan, the outcome provides an opportunity to frame the decision not merely as a bilateral legal victory, but as an affirmation of international law, treaty compliance and peaceful dispute resolution.
The central message from the ruling is clear: the Indus Waters Treaty remains in force, its obligations continue to bind both parties, and disputes concerning shared waters must be addressed through the legal mechanisms agreed by India and Pakistan.
-
Featured7 years agoLampard Names New Chelsea Manager
-
Featured6 years agoFG To Extends Lockdown In FCT, Lagos Ogun states For 7days
-
Featured7 years agoChildren Custody: Court Adjourns Mike Ezuruonye, Wife’s Case To April 7
-
Featured7 years agoNYSC Dismisses Report Of DG’s Plan To Islamize Benue Orientation Camp
-
Featured5 years agoTransfer Saga: How Mikel Obi Refused to compensate me After I Linked Him Worth $4m Deal In Kuwait SC – Okafor
-
Featured7 years ago
Board urges FG to establish one-stop rehabilitation centres in 6 geopolitical zones
-
Sports4 years ago
TINUBU LAMBAST DELE MOMODU
-
News2 years agoZulu to Super Eagles B team, President Tinubu is happy with you
