Foreign news

Opinion: How To Understand China And The CPC?

Published

4 years ago

July 6, 2021

Editor’s note: Is a rising China aggressive? How to understand China and the Communist Party of China? With those questions in mind, CGTN Anchor Zou Yue sat down with Zheng Bijian, Chairman of the China Institute of Innovation and Development Strategy. He explained that The CPC’s 100-year journey to become the leading core of the Chinese people and of the driving force for socialism with Chinese characteristics is the result of the tortuous development of China’s modern history. Today, China is ushering in a new era – an era of the people. The Millennials and Generation Z are becoming the driving force behind the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation in this new era. Views expressed in the video are his, and do not necessarily represent those of CGTN.

Zou Yue: Mr. Zheng, thank you very much for this interview. The international community is keeping a close eye on China’s development and how a fast-rising China will get along with the world. Some people think that China is developing very rapidly, while others think it is a bit aggressive. What do you think?

Zheng Bijian: Is a rising China aggressive? Let’s look at the facts. China’s rapid rise over the past 40 years has, I think, been marked by several features: Firstly, it has not engaged in colonialism like the West. Secondly, it has not pursued hegemony like the U.S. Thirdly, it has not tried to build a so-called “socialist coalition” like the Soviet Union. Fourthly, it has not been involved in military alliances like NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Fifthly, it has not waged wars to gain a better position like some countries did in World War I and World War II. These are all facts. We’ve engaged in none of these activities. Instead, we have followed the path of peaceful rise and development.

Zou Yue: This year marks the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China. What do you think about the future?

Zheng Bijian: Today, China is ushering in a new era – an era of the people. The historic mission of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation hinges on the people of a new era. So on one hand, you have “a new era of the people,” and on the other hand you have “the people of the new era.” The Millennials and Generation Z, as we commonly call them, are becoming the driving force behind the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation in this new era.

Zou Yue: Speaking of “understanding China”, on June 21 General Secretary Xi Jinping replied in a letter to international students at Peking University, saying that to understand today’s China, you must understand the Communist Party of China. You have repeatedly said that in order to understand China’s future strategy, one needs to understand the Communist Party of China. But how do we understand the CPC? What does it take to understand the Communist Party of China?

Zheng Bijian: The CPC’s 100-year journey to become the leading core of the Chinese people and of the driving force for socialism with Chinese characteristics is the result of the tortuous development of China’s modern history, that is, from the Opium War in 1840 until the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, a 109-year history.

Many Westerners always ask why China does not adopt a multi-party system or a two-party system. I think they ask this question because they are too ignorant of China’s history. In fact, after the Opium War, reformists in China were very keen to take the best knowledge and practices from the West, including multi-party competition, thinking that it was the right way to govern the country. At the beginning of the Republic of China in 1913, there were more than 300 “political parties” and the reactionary Yuan Shikai was “elected” president, who later restored the hereditary monarchy with a short-lived reign of 83 days. As a result, China’s multi-party system went completely bankrupt.

It’s not that China has never had a multi-party system. In fact, China adopted such a system long before, which in the end “threw up” an emperor. Many of the people with progressive thinking in China – including the earliest generation of the CPC – were once democrats who genuinely aspired to Western democracy, but later realized it was a dead end. Even worse, it made China vulnerable to the Western imperialists, including Japanese imperialists who sought to invade and conquer China. Chairman Mao Zedong once famously said in his work On People’s Democratic Dictatorship, “Imperialist aggression has shattered the Chinese dream of learning from the West. It is very odd – why are teachers always committing aggression against their pupils? The Chinese have learned a lot from the West, but it does not work, and the ideal can never be realized.” It was precisely this disillusionment of the Western path to democracy that led to the founding of the CPC. Actually, over the years we have seen the so-called “Jasmine Revolution” in the Middle East, and similar efforts to copy Western “democratic elections,” but they have turned out to be shams or Western plots. To be honest, the Chinese experienced such tricks more than 100 years ago.

We also need to be clear about what path we are following in today’s China. Actually, we are also following the path of democracy, but it is a different kind of democracy from its Western counterpart, which we call a “people’s democracy.” The CPC exercises state power, and eight other parties in China participate fully in the administration of state affairs. China also has an increasingly developed and sophisticated electoral and consultative system. These two parallel democratic systems constitute a more complete democracy than Western electoral democracy. We not only have the electoral democracy, but also the consultative democracy after elections, hence giving rise to a whole-process democracy. Moreover, the combination of democracy and the rule of law in China stands out as the best practice of socialist democracy with Chinese characteristics.

Share on Facebook

Featured

Financing Health Futures: Nigeria, Ghana, Uganda Turn to Tobacco and Telecom Taxes in Big Push Against Malaria

Published

1 month ago

September 28, 2025

The Gleamer

African leaders, parliamentarians, health experts, and development partners have renewed their commitment to ending malaria by 2030, with a bold call for domestic financing through innovative taxation on tobacco, alcohol, and telecom services to close critical funding gaps.

The discussions took center stage at the Big Push Against Malaria: Harnessing Africa’s Role high-level political engagement in Abuja, where Nigeria, Ghana, and Uganda showcased new homegrown financing strategies aimed at reducing dependence on dwindling donor support.

Africa’s Heavy Burden

Malaria remains one of Africa’s deadliest diseases. In 2023, the world recorded 263 million cases and nearly 600,000 deaths, with 94% of cases and 95% of deaths occurring in Africa. Nigeria alone accounted for 26.6% of global cases and 31% of deaths, according to the World Malaria Report 2024. Children under five remain the most vulnerable, making up 76% of deaths.

Despite progress — with Nigeria cutting malaria deaths by more than half since 2000 through insecticide-treated nets, preventive treatments, and the rollout of the new R21 malaria vaccine — leaders warned that global targets are off-track. The World Health Organization’s technical strategy for malaria (2016–2030) has stalled since 2017, with Africa unlikely to meet its 2025 and 2030 milestones without urgent action.

Taxing for Health Futures

The Nigerian Parliament’s Committee on HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (ATM) announced plans to fund malaria elimination through “sin taxes” and telecom levies.

According to the House Chair on ATM, Hon. Linda Ogar, a bill is underway to restructure the National Agency for the Control of AIDS (NACA) into a multi-disease agency that will address HIV, TB, and malaria.

The new financing mechanism proposes:

Taxes on tobacco, alcohol, and other luxury items

Dedicated levies on telecom airtime and mobile money transactions

A percentage of the nation’s consolidated revenue

“These resources will provide sustainable funding to strengthen health systems and accelerate malaria elimination,” Ogar said, stressing that Africa must stop relying solely on foreign donors. “We cannot continue to take two steps forward and five steps backward. Africa must begin to show the world that we are ready to solve our problems ourselves.”

Similar models are already being piloted in Ghana and Uganda, where levies on mobile money and telecoms are being redirected to finance health interventions. The Abuja meeting urged other African countries to adopt this approach as part of a continental framework for sustainable financing.

Leaders Call for Urgent Action

Nigeria’s Minister of State for Health and Social Welfare, Dr. Iziaq Adekunle Salako, emphasized that while malaria is preventable and treatable, it still kills hundreds of thousands yearly due to funding shortfalls, climate change, insecticide resistance, and humanitarian crises.

“To truly defeat this disease, we must rethink, join forces, and mount a concerted ‘Big Push’. Funding gaps remain a major obstacle, and innovative domestic financing is the way forward,” Salako declared.

From the civil society front, grassroots representatives pledged to act as “foot soldiers”, demanding that communities have a seat at the decision-making table. The World Health Organization, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Aliko Dangote Foundation, and other partners reaffirmed support but stressed the need for stronger political will and local ownership.

Private Sector and Global Support

Representing billionaire philanthropist Aliko Dangote, the Nigeria Malaria Council reiterated that private sector investment must complement government financing. Meanwhile, the Global Fund confirmed it has invested nearly $2 billion in Nigeria’s malaria response and committed an additional $500 million for 2024–2026, including support for local production of malaria drugs.

The Gates Foundation’s Uche Anaowu noted that while progress has slowed, malaria remains beatable:

“Smallpox is the only human disease ever eradicated. The question is — can malaria be next? I believe Africa has both the burden and the opportunity to lead the world in making that happen.”

Financing Health Futures: Nigeria, Ghana, Uganda Turn to Tobacco and Telecom Taxes in Big Push Against Malaria

Abuja, Nigeria – African leaders, parliamentarians, health experts, and development partners have renewed their commitment to ending malaria by 2030, with a bold call for domestic financing through innovative taxation on tobacco, alcohol, and telecom services to close critical funding gaps.

Africa’s Heavy Burden

Taxing for Health Futures

The Nigerian Parliament’s Committee on HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (ATM) announced plans to fund malaria elimination through “sin taxes” and telecom levies.

The new financing mechanism proposes:

Taxes on tobacco, alcohol, and other luxury items

Dedicated levies on telecom airtime and mobile money transactions

A percentage of the nation’s consolidated revenue

Leaders Call for Urgent Action

Private Sector and Global Support

The Gates Foundation’s Uche Anaowu noted that while progress has slowed, malaria remains beatable:

“Smallpox is the only human disease ever eradicated. The question is — can malaria be next? I believe Africa has both the burden and the opportunity to lead the world in making that happen.”

The Big Push: From Talk to Action

Speakers acknowledged that Africa has hosted too many malaria meetings without concrete outcomes. This time, however, leaders insisted the Abuja gathering must mark a turning point — from dependency to self-reliance.

With Nigeria, Ghana, and Uganda setting the pace on tax-based health financing, the continent now faces the challenge of replicating and scaling up these models.

“Now that Africa is at a critical point, the need for a Big Push against malaria cannot be overemphasized. If we align political will, innovative financing, and community engagement, we can end malaria within our lifetime.”

Nigeria, Ghana, and Uganda are pioneering a shift from donor dependence to domestic revenue mobilization via tobacco, alcohol, and telecom taxes — a model hailed as central to financing Africa’s health futures and ending malaria by 2030
Speakers acknowledged that Africa has hosted too many malaria meetings without concrete outcomes. This time, however, leaders insisted the Abuja gathering must mark a turning point — from dependency to self-reliance.

With Nigeria, Ghana, and Uganda setting the pace on tax-based health financing, the continent now faces the challenge of replicating and scaling up these models.

“Now that Africa is at a critical point, the need for a Big Push against malaria cannot be overemphasized. If we align political will, innovative financing, and community engagement, we can end malaria within our lifetime.”

Share on Facebook