Connect with us

Opinion

THE RETURN OF GRASSROOTS DEMOCRACY: HOW LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION IS GAINING NEW RELEVANCE IN NIGERIA

Published

on

By Sylvester Udemezue

(1) BACKGROUND

For many years, conversations about governance in Nigeria often revolved around the Federal Government and the States, while the Local Government system, the tier of government closest to the people, appeared increasingly weakened, marginalized and unable to fully perform its constitutional responsibilities.

Across the country, many citizens came to view Local Government Councils as little more than administrative extensions of State Governments. Local Government elections frequently attracted limited public interest. Chairmen and Councillors often operated under severe financial and political constraints. In many instances, local governance lost its attractiveness, vibrancy and capacity to serve as the foundation of democratic participation.

Today, however, a new conversation is emerging. A combination of political will, institutional reforms and a landmark Supreme Court judgment delivered on 11 July 2024 has reignited national attention on grassroots governance and has created fresh opportunities for the revitalisation of Local Government administration in Nigeria.

(2). THE REALITY BEFORE THE REFORMS

Before the recent developments, one of the major concerns regarding Local Government administration was the operation of the State Joint Local Government Account.

Although established under constitutional arrangements, critics argued that the system often enabled excessive control of Local Government finances by State Governments. Consequently, many Local Government Councils struggled to exercise meaningful financial autonomy.

As a result

(a). Local Government administration became increasingly dependent on State Governments

(b). Development initiatives at the grassroots level often suffered delays or limitations.

(c). Many citizens lost confidence in Local Government institutions.

(d). Local Government elections attracted less enthusiasm than they ought to have.

(e). The position of Local Government Chairman gradually lost much of its appeal and strategic significance.

Over time, concerns grew among scholars, civil society organisations, legal practitioners and democratic reform advocates that the constitutional vision of Local Government as a distinct tier of government was being undermined.

(3). PRESIDENT TINUBU’S INTERVENTION

One of the most consequential governance initiatives undertaken during the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu was the Federal Government’s decision to approach the Supreme Court seeking the protection of constitutional Local Government autonomy.

Through the Attorney-General of the Federation, the Federal Government instituted proceedings against the thirty-six State Governments, asking the Supreme Court to restore the constitutional status of Local Government Councils and ensure that funds allocated to them reach them directly.

This move represented a significant institutional effort aimed at strengthening democratic governance at the grassroots level.

(4). THE LANDMARK SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT

On 11 July 2024, the Supreme Court delivered what many observers have described as one of the most important constitutional judgments in Nigeria’s democratic history.

The Court held, among other things, that:

(a). Funds allocated to Local Governments should be paid directly to them.

(b). State Governments should not retain or control Local Government allocations.

(c). Democratically elected Local Government Councils must be respected.

(d). Caretaker arrangements cannot replace constitutionally recognised elected councils indefinitely.

(d). Local Governments are entitled to exercise their constitutional functions as a distinct tier of government.

The judgment effectively reaffirmed the constitutional place of Local Government administration within Nigeria’s federal system and sought to address longstanding concerns about financial dependence and political subordination.

(5) THE POSITIVE IMPACT ALREADY BEING FELT

Although the reforms are still evolving, several positive developments are becoming increasingly visible.

  1. Renewed Interest in Grassroots Politics: Across many parts of Nigeria, Local Government politics is attracting renewed attention. Political actors, community leaders, youth groups and stakeholders increasingly recognize that Local Government leadership may now possess greater relevance and practical significance than before. The office of Local Government Chairman is once again being viewed as an important platform for development and public service.
  2. Increased Financial Expectations: With direct allocation mechanisms being pursued following the Supreme Court judgment, Local Governments are expected to have greater access to resources intended for grassroots development. Where properly managed, this can translate into: Better rural roads, improved primary healthcare; Enhanced sanitation services; More effective primary education support; Expanded agricultural initiatives; Stronger community development programmes.
  3. Strengthening Democratic Accountability: When citizens know that resources are reaching Local Governments directly, expectations for transparency and accountability naturally increase. Local Government Chairmen and Councillors may now find themselves under greater public scrutiny, thereby encouraging more responsible governance.
  4. Revitalisation of Constitutional Democracy: The judgment reinforces an important democratic principle: government should not be concentrated at a single level. Strong Local Governments create opportunities for broader participation, leadership development and citizen engagement. Democracy becomes more meaningful when it is experienced not only in Abuja and State Capitals, but also in wards, villages, districts and communities.

(6). The FCT Experience: A Sign of Renewed Confidence:

The recent Area Council elections in the Federal Capital Territory offered an indication of the growing relevance of grassroots governance. Political activities surrounding the elections generated considerable attention among stakeholders and contestants.

Many observers believe that one reason for this renewed interest is the increasing recognition that Local Government institutions may now possess greater authority, visibility and developmental potential than they did in previous years. While competitive elections alone do not guarantee good governance, heightened public interest in Local Government contests is nevertheless a positive democratic indicator.

(7). A New Era of Possibility

It would be premature to suggest that all challenges facing Local Governments have been resolved. Issues of accountability, capacity building, transparency and responsible management of public funds remain critically important. Indeed, financial autonomy must be accompanied by financial discipline. Direct funding alone cannot guarantee development. Good leadership, prudent management and active citizen participation will ultimately determine whether the promise of Local Government autonomy translates into tangible improvements in the lives of ordinary Nigerians.

Nevertheless, it is difficult to dispute that the 2024 Supreme Court judgment and the efforts that led to it have altered the national conversation about grassroots governance. For perhaps the first time in many years, Local Government administration is once again occupying a central place in discussions about democratic development and public service delivery.

(7). CONCLUSION

History may ultimately record the Local Government autonomy initiative as one of the most significant institutional reforms undertaken during the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

By supporting the constitutional restoration of Local Government authority and pursuing a judicial resolution to longstanding concerns over Local Government finances, the administration helped reopen the door to a stronger and more vibrant grassroots democracy. The task before Nigerians now is to ensure that this opportunity is not wasted. If Local Government leaders embrace transparency, accountability and service, and if citizens remain actively engaged in monitoring governance, the result could be a genuine democratic renaissance at the grassroots level. A stronger Local Government system means stronger communities. And stronger communities ultimately mean a stronger Nigeria.

Respectfully,
Sylvester Udemezue (Udems).
udemsbackup@gmail.com.
10 June 2026

Continue Reading

Opinion

RE: BLAIR “HAS QUESTIONS TO ANSWER” OVER SUPPORT FOR BRITAIN WHILE ADVISING NIGERIA

Published

on

(A rejoinder to Gordon Rayner’s article of October 18,2026  in the Telegraph, UK
By Kehinde Bamigbetan
​After reading this article, particularly the denials from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change and the Federal Government of Nigeria, one is bound to question the editorial judgment that gives this piece any value.

​In short, what did Gordon Rainer set out to do with this publication? Put a shine on Jupiter’s false and thoroughly empty narrative? Set up a former Prime Minister for blackmail and opprobrium? Or revive a dead case before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes?

​Whichever, Rainer presents propositions which swallow their answers. His first argument that Blair might have undermined British national security interests is contradicted by the disclosure that the TBI has no contract to advise the Federal Government of Nigeria.

​His second argument, that Jupiter was denied the execution of its licence, is contradicted by the fact that the company is unknown under Nigerian law. Rainer then admits knowing this fact and introduces the company as Jupiter’s partners.

​For clarity and the benefit of his readers, these companies—Basin Mining Limited and Range Mining Limited—lost their licences for failing to pay annual service fees. Basin, for instance, owes N1,223,750,000, about £691,368. 

The licences were revoked after the companies ignored several notices to fulfil their contractual obligations to the Nigerian Mining Cadastral Office. Penalties for non-payment are increasing daily, and the legal process to recover the funds is underway.

​Rather than rescue its partners by paying their fees and penalties or allow the international settlement court to determine its case, Jupiter has mounted an international self-help campaign of calumny and economic sabotage against the government and people of Nigeria, using methods that threaten Nigeria’s security and diplomatic interests.

​We believe Rainer is its latest innocent recruit, hoodwinked into propagating a false narrative by appealing to British national security interests when, in fact, Jupiter’s partners are, under Nigerian law, economic and security risks whose continued defiance of Nigeria’s laws endangers centuries of Britain-Nigeria relations.

​The question Rainer should ask: if, indeed, Jupiter has a cast-iron case, why is it shedding crocodile tears and shopping for sympathy with false pretences and narratives?

​Let’s give the clue: Jupiter’s promoter, Steve Davis, has leeched on Nigeria’s presidents since 1999 by pretending to be an international mining expert, and he has acquired an ego and assets far out of proportion to his financial and technical status. 
He is so comfortable living above the law in Nigeria that compliance with regulatory provisions is a taboo, an affront to his bloated ego as a self-deluded “founder of Nigeria’s modern mining sector.”

​Davis had a good time living his ego until Dele Alake became Nigeria’s Minister of Solid Minerals Development in August 2023 and immediately launched a clean-up of the sector focused on zero-tolerance for non-compliance with the provisions of the Nigeria Minerals and Mining Law 2007, a law that Davis boasts he contributed to making and should set an example by encouraging compliance.

​The Minister was shocked that the Nigerian Mining Cadastre had a huge amount of unpaid statutory fees despite the government’s investment in the Electronic Mining Cadastre Plus (EMC+) automation, which digitised the licensing process and upgraded services to the mining sector.

​In line with the law, the minister ensured debtors were duly notified, and defaulters duly gazetted before revoking their licences for flouting the regulation on the payment of annual service fees.

​In November 2023, the minister revoked at least 1,663 licences, a decision that showed it was no longer business as usual under the new sheriff in town. 

To show the government has a human face, it opened a three-month restitution window to address complaints and feedback indicating cases of extenuating circumstances.

​But still basking in the euphoria of an ego that has outlived its era, Davis discouraged his partners from taking advantage of these opportunities for remorse. Instead, he threatened to exploit his global networks to frustrate the Federal Government of Nigeria.

​He wasn’t joking. He launched a global disinformation campaign from his native Australia to Canada, from the United States to Europe. However, his lies evaporated as soon as the facts were laid bare.

​Davis pulled his most ambitious stunt so far during Nigeria’s President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s official visit to the United Kingdom in March this year, when he polluted the air with narratives designed to set Nigeria against the West by spreading blatant falsehoods and playing the victim.

​But, as he found out to his misery, the whole public relations game was dead on arrival. A comprehensive statement clarifying the issues to the highly intelligent British media sent him into the cold.

​All we ask is that journalists refer to the eternal maxim of the journalism profession whenever Davis knocks on their door: if in doubt, leave it out.

​When a story like this betrays so many contradictions, the rule is not to encourage its spread. Every responsible journalist has the moral duty to kill it.

​Kehinde Bamigbetan is a Journalist and Special Adviser to Dele Alake, the Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Federal Republic of Nigeria

Continue Reading

Trending

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)