Featured

Warri Indigenous People’s Movement Accuses Tantita Security of Oppression, Calls for Contract Review

Published

5 months ago

June 24, 2025

Joel Ajayi

The Warri Indigenous People’s Movement (WIPM) has condemned what it described as a campaign of oppression, intimidation, and illegal annexation of Itsekiri communities by Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited, operated by ex-militant leader Mr. Government Ekpemupolo, popularly known as Tompolo.

In a statement signed by WIPM Chairman, Hon. Kingsley Tenumah, and General Secretary, Comrade Monoyo Edon, the group criticized what it called a deliberate attempt by Tompolo and his associates to divert attention from a peaceful protest and formal petition submitted by the group in Abuja on June 18, 2025.

The protest highlighted alleged abuses and contract violations by Tantita Security in the Warri area of Delta State.
WIPM clarified that their opposition is not rooted in ethnicity or Tompolo’s Ijaw background, noting that many Itsekiris have previously supported his security contract.

However, the group insists the current issue is about the misuse of power and the alleged deviation from the original purpose of the surveillance contract.

“We are not against Tompolo’s contract. But what we oppose is the use of that contract as a tool for land annexation, unlawful arrests, and ethnic subjugation,” the statement read.

The group expressed disappointment at some Itsekiris working with Tantita, accusing them of compromising the interest of their people in exchange for financial benefits.

“They have chosen personal gain over the welfare of the Itsekiri people. Their defense of Tantita’s activities in our communities is both shameless and hypocritical,” the statement added.

According to WIPM, Tantita operatives have been involved in forceful invasions of communities such as Usor, Tisun, Ajelebe, Akpata, Kantu, and Ijaghala—allegedly arresting residents, torturing them, and attempting to erase their Itsekiri identity.

The group also alleged that Tantita operatives recently arrested workers from a telecom firm, Globacom, who were working in Kantu, an Itsekiri community. They further claimed that during the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) ward delineation exercise, in collaboration with some government officials, there were attempts to rename and reassign Itsekiri communities to Ijaw identities.

“These actions not only threaten our people but also violate Section 257 of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), which holds host communities responsible for the protection of oil assets within their domain,” the statement said.

WIPM argued that continued operations by Tantita in the Warri area will lead to further unrest, urging President Bola Tinubu and the Federal Government to reassign the surveillance contract in the area to competent Itsekiri security outfits.

“This is not a call against contracts for other ethnic groups. It is a call against annexation, abuse of power, and ethnic intimidation. Our communities deserve protection and respect, not subjugation under the guise of security operations,” the statement concluded.

WIPM vowed to resist what it described as an ongoing attempt to undermine the Itsekiri political and economic identity, while calling for fairness, transparency, and accountability in the allocation and execution of security contracts in the Niger Delta.

Share on Facebook

Featured

From U.S. Alarm to Tinubu’s Validation

Published

2 days ago

November 22, 2025

The Gleamer

U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent decision to list Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” triggered a wave of reactions across diplomatic and political circles.

While many Nigerians viewed the designation as a national embarrassment and critics seized it as evidence of deepening instability, the development has taken on a surprising twist: it has become an unintended validation of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s ongoing reforms.

For global observers, Trump’s warning underscored the security and governance challenges facing Africa’s largest democracy. But within Nigeria, it cast renewed attention on Tinubu’s attempts to tackle the very issues that led to the U.S. designation from terror attacks and mass kidnappings to deep rooted economic distortions.

Political analysts note that long before Trump’s statement, Tinubu had already begun overhauling Nigeria’s security and economic systems, taking steps more far-reaching than those implemented by his predecessors. Trump may have amplified global concern, but Tinubu had already moved into the repair phase.

Upon assuming office, Tinubu inherited a nation strained by years of structural decline a costly fuel subsidy regime, an opaque multi-tiered foreign exchange system, rising insecurity, and widening regional imbalances. Instead of opting for gradualism, he pursued sweeping measures aimed at resetting Nigeria’s foundations.

One of his earliest actions was an overhaul of the security architecture. Tinubu dismissed and replaced the previous service chiefs, appointed field tested commanders, strengthened joint operations, and demanded measurable results. The armed forces intensified land and air offensives, resulting in major arrests, rescue operations, and the neutralisation of terror cells. Security improvements were coupled with community-level interventions to break cycles of violence and restore economic activity in long neglected regions.

Economically, Tinubu took two of the most contentious decisions in decades: removal of petrol subsidy and unification of the exchange rate. His administration framed the decisions as necessary to end fiscal leakages and curb entrenched rent-seeking. Though the reforms generated short-term hardships, they also freed revenue for federal and state governments and signaled to investors that Nigeria was ready for structural cleanup.

In governance, Tinubu implemented what analysts describe as an equity-driven restructuring of the federation. Every geopolitical zone now has a dedicated regional development commission a move designed to institutionalise fairness and ensure balanced growth. This expansion is widely regarded as one of the administration’s most strategic long-term decisions.

Meanwhile, Nigeria is witnessing what officials describe as a new wave of infrastructure expansion. Work is underway on the multi-state Lagos–Calabar Coastal Highway, the Sokoto–Badagry Super Highway, major rail upgrades, power sector reforms, and the rehabilitation of key federal roads. Port modernization projects are also accelerating to position Nigeria as a competitive maritime hub.

International confidence appears to be responding to these reforms. Tinubu has pursued aggressive economic diplomacy, securing investment commitments from the UAE, Germany, Saudi Arabia, the United States, and leading multinationals. Government officials report that more than $30 billion in investment pledges were recorded during the administration’s first year.

The government has also launched a comprehensive tax reform effort aimed at curbing multiple taxation, expanding the tax net, and strengthening transparency a shift intended to help raise Nigeria’s historically low tax-to-GDP ratio.

As global reactions to Trump’s warning continue, Nigerian officials argue that the designation inadvertently highlights a turning point rather than a downward spiral. While the U.S. warning spotlighted Nigeria’s challenges, Tinubu’s defenders say the administration is already confronting those challenges with bold, long-term reforms.

In this framing, Trump’s alarm has become a backdrop that underscores the urgency of Tinubu’s agenda and, paradoxically, the evidence of its relevance.

Supporters of the president say the label “country of concern” is being transformed into a story of a country in recovery, driven by a leader intent on reversing years of stagnation. According to them, Tinubu’s approach prioritising difficult reforms over popular short-term fixes is precisely what positions Nigeria for renewed global confidence.

In a twist of geopolitical irony, what was meant to warn the world about Nigeria may now be drawing attention to an unfolding attempt at national renewal.

Share on Facebook