Opinion

Homeland Security or Homeland Patronage?

Published

5 months ago

May 14, 2026

…Nigeria Cannot Keep Inventing Offices to Avoid Real Reform

By Comrade Ibrahim M. Zikirullahi

Nigeria awoke recently to the announcement of a new political creation: the Special Adviser on Homeland Security. Predictably, the cheerleaders of the administration—the “City Boys”, the “Renewed Hope” chorus, and the usual orbit of political loyalists—erupted in celebration. To hear them tell it, this single appointment is the longawaited masterstroke that will end kidnapping, banditry, insurgency, and terrorism.

If only governance were that easy.
Nigeria’s insecurity crisis is not a problem of insufficient titles. It is a problem of insufficient political will. And no number of new offices, however grandly named, can substitute for leadership that is ready to confront the roots of our national decay.

The Real Question: What Is Wrong With What We Already Have?

Before we applaud another bureaucratic invention, we must ask:
Why are the existing security structures failing? Is it a lack of capacity? A lack of coordination? Or a lack of sincerity at the highest levels?

Creating a new “Homeland Security” office without fixing the rot in the current system is like building a new roof on a house with collapsing foundations. It may look impressive, but it solves nothing.

Nigeria’s Endless Cycle of Cosmetic Reforms

We have seen this pattern before. From the era of military rule to the present civilian administrations, Nigerians have been told that privatization, concessioning, and PPPs were the magic keys to prosperity. Instead, national assets were sold to political insiders at giveaway prices, often financed with public funds. The result?

*Electricity worse than it was in the 1970s

*Roads that endanger rather than connect

*Schools and hospitals in states of abandonment

More recently, fuel subsidy removal, naira depreciation, aggressive borrowing, and new tax regimes have produced predictable outcomes: rising poverty, millions of outofschool children, and a healthcare system out of reach for ordinary citizens.

These are not reforms. They are rituals—performed for applause, not for impact.

Copying Foreign Models Without Local Understanding

Some argue that the United States and United Kingdom have Departments of Homeland Security, so Nigeria must follow suit. But this comparison is shallow. Nigeria already has a functional equivalent: the Ministry of Interior.
What we lack is not structure.
What we lack is competence, independence, and accountability.

Recruiting the right people—and allowing them to work without political interference—would do far more for national security than multiplying offices to reward political allies.

When Governance Becomes Patronage

A nation begins to fail when public institutions forget their purpose. Today, many Ministries, Departments, and Agencies have been reduced to distribution centres for rice, wrappers, and handouts. When institutions become charity kiosks, the system collapses—and no new adviser or special assistant can rescue it.

Nigeria Deserves More Than Symbolism

Nigeria cannot continue inflating the cost of governance while deflating the dignity of governance. We cannot keep inventing new offices to mask old failures. What the country needs is not another adviser. It needs courage. It needs sincerity. It needs leadership that values results over rituals.

Until then, every new appointment—no matter how elegantly packaged—will remain what it truly is: Another food for the boys.

Share on Facebook

Opinion

RE: BLAIR “HAS QUESTIONS TO ANSWER” OVER SUPPORT FOR BRITAIN WHILE ADVISING NIGERIA

Published

2 days ago

October 20, 2026

The Gleamer

(A rejoinder to Gordon Rayner’s article of October 18,2026 in the Telegraph, UK
By Kehinde Bamigbetan
After reading this article, particularly the denials from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change and the Federal Government of Nigeria, one is bound to question the editorial judgment that gives this piece any value.

In short, what did Gordon Rainer set out to do with this publication? Put a shine on Jupiter’s false and thoroughly empty narrative? Set up a former Prime Minister for blackmail and opprobrium? Or revive a dead case before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes?

Whichever, Rainer presents propositions which swallow their answers. His first argument that Blair might have undermined British national security interests is contradicted by the disclosure that the TBI has no contract to advise the Federal Government of Nigeria.

His second argument, that Jupiter was denied the execution of its licence, is contradicted by the fact that the company is unknown under Nigerian law. Rainer then admits knowing this fact and introduces the company as Jupiter’s partners.

For clarity and the benefit of his readers, these companies—Basin Mining Limited and Range Mining Limited—lost their licences for failing to pay annual service fees. Basin, for instance, owes N1,223,750,000, about £691,368.

The licences were revoked after the companies ignored several notices to fulfil their contractual obligations to the Nigerian Mining Cadastral Office. Penalties for non-payment are increasing daily, and the legal process to recover the funds is underway.

Rather than rescue its partners by paying their fees and penalties or allow the international settlement court to determine its case, Jupiter has mounted an international self-help campaign of calumny and economic sabotage against the government and people of Nigeria, using methods that threaten Nigeria’s security and diplomatic interests.

We believe Rainer is its latest innocent recruit, hoodwinked into propagating a false narrative by appealing to British national security interests when, in fact, Jupiter’s partners are, under Nigerian law, economic and security risks whose continued defiance of Nigeria’s laws endangers centuries of Britain-Nigeria relations.

The question Rainer should ask: if, indeed, Jupiter has a cast-iron case, why is it shedding crocodile tears and shopping for sympathy with false pretences and narratives?

Let’s give the clue: Jupiter’s promoter, Steve Davis, has leeched on Nigeria’s presidents since 1999 by pretending to be an international mining expert, and he has acquired an ego and assets far out of proportion to his financial and technical status.
He is so comfortable living above the law in Nigeria that compliance with regulatory provisions is a taboo, an affront to his bloated ego as a self-deluded “founder of Nigeria’s modern mining sector.”

Davis had a good time living his ego until Dele Alake became Nigeria’s Minister of Solid Minerals Development in August 2023 and immediately launched a clean-up of the sector focused on zero-tolerance for non-compliance with the provisions of the Nigeria Minerals and Mining Law 2007, a law that Davis boasts he contributed to making and should set an example by encouraging compliance.

The Minister was shocked that the Nigerian Mining Cadastre had a huge amount of unpaid statutory fees despite the government’s investment in the Electronic Mining Cadastre Plus (EMC+) automation, which digitised the licensing process and upgraded services to the mining sector.

In line with the law, the minister ensured debtors were duly notified, and defaulters duly gazetted before revoking their licences for flouting the regulation on the payment of annual service fees.

In November 2023, the minister revoked at least 1,663 licences, a decision that showed it was no longer business as usual under the new sheriff in town.

To show the government has a human face, it opened a three-month restitution window to address complaints and feedback indicating cases of extenuating circumstances.

But still basking in the euphoria of an ego that has outlived its era, Davis discouraged his partners from taking advantage of these opportunities for remorse. Instead, he threatened to exploit his global networks to frustrate the Federal Government of Nigeria.

He wasn’t joking. He launched a global disinformation campaign from his native Australia to Canada, from the United States to Europe. However, his lies evaporated as soon as the facts were laid bare.

Davis pulled his most ambitious stunt so far during Nigeria’s President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s official visit to the United Kingdom in March this year, when he polluted the air with narratives designed to set Nigeria against the West by spreading blatant falsehoods and playing the victim.

But, as he found out to his misery, the whole public relations game was dead on arrival. A comprehensive statement clarifying the issues to the highly intelligent British media sent him into the cold.

All we ask is that journalists refer to the eternal maxim of the journalism profession whenever Davis knocks on their door: if in doubt, leave it out.

When a story like this betrays so many contradictions, the rule is not to encourage its spread. Every responsible journalist has the moral duty to kill it.

Kehinde Bamigbetan is a Journalist and Special Adviser to Dele Alake, the Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Federal Republic of Nigeria

Share on Facebook