Connect with us

Opinion

Ochei At NIMASA: A Record Beyond Political Propaganda

Published

on

The attempt by Senator Ifeanyi Okowa’s media supporters to dismiss Rt. Hon. Victor Ochei’s tenure at NIMASA by asking how many Delta North indigenes he employed or what projects he personally attracted is built on a false comparison.

Ochei served as Executive Director, Maritime Labour and Cabotage Services one of three Executive Directors working under the Director-General of NIMASA. He was not the Director-General, Minister of Transportation or chief executive of a state government. NIMASA itself confirms his appointment to that specific portfolio.

His job was essentially maritime labour administration, protection and welfare of seafarers and dockworkers, development of indigenous maritime manpower, industrial relations and implementation of the labour aspects of Nigeria’s Cabotage regime. These are among the statutory responsibilities NIMASA assigns to Maritime Labour Services.

And there are documented footprints from Ochei’s tenure.

As Executive Director and Chairman of the National Joint Industrial Council, he participated directly in negotiations for improved wages and working conditions for dockworkers and seafarers. He also represented NIMASA’s Director-General at the launch of the electronic registration and biometric identification platform for seafarers and dockworkers.

Under the Cabotage side of his portfolio, Ochei was involved in efforts to strengthen indigenous participation in Nigerian shipping. In 2023, when the Ghana Maritime Authority came to Nigeria to understudy Nigeria’s Cabotage system, Ochei was the official who explained Nigeria’s experience, legislation, enforcement procedures and four pillars of Cabotage to the delegation.

That is measurable responsibility within the mandate he was given.

THEN THERE IS THE OKOWA CONNECTION

Perhaps the most revealing evidence comes from Government House, Asaba.

In 2021, NIMASA’s Executive Management visited then Governor Ifeanyi Okowa. Victor Ochei was part of that delegation, and NIMASA’s official report and photograph identified him alongside the Director-General during the meeting.

At that meeting, NIMASA highlighted major maritime interventions in Delta State, including the Nigeria Maritime University at Okerenkoko, the NIMASA Science and Technical College at Okoloba and a proposed ship-repair yard. The agency also stated that more than 1,000 Delta indigenes had benefited from its overseas maritime scholarship programme.

Significantly, Governor Okowa himself acknowledged NIMASA’s contribution and expressed appreciation for the scholarships given to Deltans.

Nobody needs to falsely credit all those institutional projects to Ochei personally some predated his appointment. But that same honesty means nobody should now pretend that the NIMASA management in which Ochei served had no meaningful connection or impact in Delta State.

COMPARE LIKE WITH LIKE

The weakest part of the attack is attempting to measure an Executive Director of a federal regulatory agency by the standard of an Executive Governor who controlled an entire state administration for eight years.

If Ochei’s critics insist on making that comparison, they invite the more important question:

Who had greater executive power, greater control over public resources and consequently a greater responsibility to deliver transformational development?

Certainly not an Executive Director of one department in NIMASA.

Let Ochei be judged by the responsibilities attached to his office and let Okowa be judged by the enormous powers and resources available to him during eight years as Governor.

Compare mandate with mandate.
Compare opportunity with results.
Compare responsibility with performance.

On those terms, the argument that Ochei achieved nothing at NIMASA simply does not survive the documented record.

Rt Hon (Engr.) Victor Ochei remains the choice of the people of Delta North

Austin Edemodu PhD is an Abuja based Journalist and Public Affairs Analyst.

Continue Reading

Opinion

China-Africa Cooperation: Tackling Insecurity Through Development

Lt. Gen. Abdulrahman B. Dambazau (rtd), PhD, CFR, Ambassador of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to the People’s Republic of China.

Published

on


By Lt. Gen. Abdulrahman B. Dambazau (rtd), PhD, CFR


A farmer who cannot safely reach his land, a child whose school has closed because of violence, and a young graduate unable to find productive employment experience insecurity in different ways.

Their circumstances reveal a common challenge: lasting peace requires protection from violence and the opportunity to live with dignity. This connection should occupy a central place in China–Africa cooperation.


My experience in military leadership, internal security and diplomacy has reinforced my conviction that security operations must form part of a broader national effort. Armed forces and law enforcement agencies have indispensable responsibilities to protect communities, confront violent groups and uphold the law.

The gains they secure become durable when legitimate institutions, functioning services and economic opportunities take root.


Development is therefore a strategic component of security. Where communities can farm, trade, learn and obtain justice, they have stronger foundations for resisting the pressures that sustain violence.


Poverty does not automatically produce terrorism or criminality. Millions endure hardship without turning to violence. Insecurity also arises from political exclusion, contested resources, extremist ideologies, organised crime and institutional weakness. Nevertheless, prolonged deprivation and a lack of credible opportunities can create vulnerabilities that violent actors exploit.

Effective policy must address both those actors and the conditions that enable their influence.
China–Africa cooperation offers a framework for advancing this approach. The Forum on China–Africa Cooperation’s Beijing Action Plan for 2025–2027 brings peace and security into the same programme as industrialisation, agriculture, infrastructure, education, public health and green development. Its significance lies in the opportunity to connect these fields through practical implementation.


China’s development experience provides useful lessons. A joint study by the World Bank and Chinese institutions reported in 2022 that, over the preceding four decades, the number of people in China living below the international extreme-poverty line then in use had fallen by close to 800 million.

The study emphasised economic transformation alongside targeted poverty reduction measures. African countries can examine how agricultural productivity, infrastructure, education and employment expanded opportunity, while adapting relevant lessons to their own circumstances.


Africa’s countries have distinct histories, political systems and development priorities. Cooperation will achieve more when African governments define their needs clearly and negotiate partnerships that strengthen domestic capabilities. African ownership must guide project selection, implementation and assessment.


Agriculture should be an immediate priority. In communities affected by insecurity, restoring farming and rural commerce can support recovery and stability. Cooperation in irrigation, improved seeds, machinery, storage, processing and extension services can raise productivity and strengthen livelihoods. Investment should be accompanied by secure access to land, fair arrangements for managing water and grazing resources, and credible mechanisms for resolving disputes.


A processing facility has greater value when farmers can reach it safely, receive fair payment and access wider markets. Communities emerging from violence also need assistance that enables displaced families to return voluntarily, safely and with dignity, and rebuild sustainable livelihoods. Development planning and security planning must meet at this practical level.


Reliable electricity and productive industry are equally important. Power supply enables workshops, factories, health facilities and digital enterprises to function. Industrial cooperation should create opportunities for African workers, suppliers and entrepreneurs, with clear provisions for skills transfer and the maintenance of equipment and facilities.


Young people need realistic pathways from education to work. Technical training should connect to actual demand in manufacturing, construction, agriculture, logistics and technology. Programmes should be assessed by the capabilities and employment they produce. Partnerships between training institutions and employers can help ensure that qualifications lead to productive work.


Infrastructure must be judged by the economic activity and public services it enables. A railway, road or port can support national integration and trade, but its wider benefits depend on connections to local production and affordable access. Project planning must account for maintenance, environmental protection, community interests and financial sustainability. Financing arrangements should be transparent, with repayment obligations assessed against realistic economic returns and public resources.
Education and health deserve the same strategic attention.

Schools help communities recover continuity and hope after disruption. Accessible healthcare reduces household vulnerability and strengthens confidence in public institutions. Cooperation among universities, research centres, hospitals and technical colleges can build the expertise African countries need to sustain these services.


Women must participate fully in this work. Their livelihoods, access to services and involvement in local decision-making matter to household resilience and community recovery. Programmes designed without their participation risk overlooking essential needs and sources of knowledge.


Development cannot compensate for injustice. Communities require fair policing, accessible courts, accountable administration and protection from abuse. A school or clinic will contribute more to lasting stability where citizens also trust public institutions to treat them fairly. Economic investment and institutional reform should proceed together.


Security cooperation should reinforce these foundations. Professional training, peacekeeping capacity, maritime security, action against illicit arms and stronger responses to organised crime can help protect development gains.

Such cooperation should uphold national law, human rights and accountability. Its ultimate purpose must be the safety of people and the strengthening of legitimate institutions.
For Nigeria, the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership established during President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s September 2024 visit to China provides a framework for pursuing these objectives. It offers an opportunity to connect bilateral cooperation more closely with Nigeria’s priorities for economic transformation and national security.


The next task is disciplined implementation. Every major commitment should have an identified responsible institution, a financing arrangement, a timetable and measurable outcomes. Proposed projects, signed agreements, funds disbursed and completed investments represent different stages of progress. Public reporting should make those distinctions clear.


We should ask practical questions. Has an agricultural project improved farmers’ incomes? Has an industrial investment created sustainable employment and developed local suppliers? Has training transferred skills that institutions can retain? Have communities affected by conflict gained safer access to schools, healthcare and markets?


These questions should guide the assessment of cooperation. They also require African governments to fulfil their own responsibilities: coordinating institutions, protecting public resources, maintaining infrastructure and ensuring that investment benefits communities fairly. Regional cooperation is essential where trade routes, shared resources and security threats cross national borders.


China–Africa cooperation can contribute substantially to peace when development expands opportunity, institutions earn public trust and security agencies protect citizens effectively. Its lasting achievement should be visible in ordinary lives: farmers returning safely to their fields, young people securing worthwhile work and children remaining in school. These are the foundations on which a more secure Africa can be built.


_Abdulrahman B. Dambazau is a retired Lieutenant General, former Chief of Army Staff and former Minister of Interior. He is currently the Ambassador of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to the People’s Republic of China. He writes from Beijing, China._

Continue Reading

Trending

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)